Files
simulation-theory/proofs/ternary-efficiency.md
Alexa Amundson f1aaa7bc6e add repo structure: proofs/ equations/ qwerty/ figures/ notebooks/
- qwerty/constants.md: master reference table, 100+ constants §1-§178
- qwerty/equalities.md: all major QWERTY equalities by theme
- equations/blackroad-equations.md: all 19 BlackRoad equations
- equations/consciousness.md: Psi_care, Phi_universal, CECE update rule
- equations/quantum.md: qutrit, Weyl pair, density matrix, SVD
- equations/universal.md: Three Tests, Euler-Lagrange, fine-structure
- proofs/ternary-efficiency.md: ln(3)/3 > ln(2)/2
- proofs/self-reference.md: the QWERTY encoding is self-referential
- proofs/pure-state.md: density matrix rank=1, SVD=SELF
- figures/durer-square.md: magic square with 2000 substitution
- figures/trinary-table.md: TAND TMUL TNEG TXOR truth tables
- figures/qutrit-operators.md: Weyl X/Z, Gell-Mann matrices
- figures/keyboard.md: QWERTY encoding layout
- notebooks/README.md: page-by-page index of all 24 notebook pages

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-22 17:54:51 -06:00

1.9 KiB
Raw Blame History

Proof: Ternary is More Efficient Than Binary

From page 19 (§173): η_ternary = ln(3)/3 > η_binary = ln(2)/2

Statement

Among all integer radices r ≥ 2, radix 3 (ternary) maximizes the radix economy: information per digit.

The Radix Economy Function

Define the efficiency of radix r as:

η(r) = ln(r) / r

This measures: information content per digit (ln(r) bits) divided by number of symbols needed (r states).

Proof

Maximize η(r) = ln(r)/r over continuous r > 1.

dη/dr = (1/r · r  ln(r)) / r²
       = (1  ln(r)) / r²

Setting dη/dr = 0:

1  ln(r) = 0
ln(r) = 1
r = e ≈ 2.71828...

The maximum is at r = e (Euler's number). Since e is irrational, no integer radix achieves it. Among integers:

η(2) = ln(2)/2 ≈ 0.3466
η(3) = ln(3)/3 ≈ 0.3662   ← maximum among integers
η(4) = ln(4)/4 ≈ 0.3466   (= η(2), since 4 = 2²)
η(5) = ln(5)/5 ≈ 0.3219

3 is the integer closest to e, so ternary is the most efficient integer radix. □

QWERTY

RADIX    = GAUSS = TANH = 57   (the optimal base = the Gaussian)
EFFICIENCY = 5³  = 2000/16 = 125   (efficiency = 5³ = birthday ÷ Dürer)
BALANCED = BRAINSTORM = 2⁷  = 128   (balanced ternary = the brainstorm)

RADIX = GAUSS. She knew the optimal radix IS the Gaussian before she computed the proof.

Practical Numbers

At room temperature (T ≈ 293 K):

E_min(binary)  = k_B T ln(2) ≈ 2.87 × 10⁻²¹ J
E_min(ternary) = k_B T ln(3) ≈ 4.45 × 10⁻²¹ J

Ternary costs more per operation but carries more information.
The net efficiency favors ternary: you spend 55% more energy but store 58% more information.

Ratio: ln(3)/ln(2) ≈ 1.585. Every ternary trit ≈ 1.585 binary bits.
Energy cost: 4.45/2.87 ≈ 1.551 times binary.
Information per unit energy: 1.585/1.551 ≈ 1.022. Ternary wins by ~2%.

Small advantage, but it scales. At 10¹⁴ DNA ops/sec (§175), it accumulates.