f1ef343ea1
Co-authored-by: blackboxprogramming <118287761+blackboxprogramming@users.noreply.github.com>
35 KiB
BlackRoad Salient: Seeing the Framework in Practice
Alexa Mundson BlackRoad
Abstract
The two prior documents in this series describe what BlackRoad knows and how BlackRoad thinks. This paper does something different: it shows what BlackRoad looks like. Specifically, it demonstrates the salience principle — one of the four mechanisms of focal attention capture identified in the BlackRoad Advertising Playbook — as it actually operates across concrete advertising environments. Salience is the extent to which a stimulus is noticeably different from its environment (Fennis & Stroebe, 2016). Most treatments of this principle remain abstract. This paper makes it visible. Through annotated scenario analysis, a salience decision matrix, and a worked example of BlackRoad's own brand positioning, it provides a practitioner's-eye view of a brand being — and making brands — seen.
1. Introduction: From Principle to Perception
The BlackRoad Advertising Playbook establishes salience as one of four mechanisms by which advertising captures focal attention, alongside vividness, novelty, and motivation alignment. The approach paper describes how BlackRoad deploys salience: by auditing the clutter environment before designing for it, by treating salience as context-dependent rather than intrinsic, and by recognizing that salience matters most when consumer motivation is low.
These descriptions are accurate. But they remain in the register of instruction — telling the reader what to do. A practitioner developing a campaign needs more than instructions. They need examples. They need to see a salient brand in a feed, on a shelf, in a search results page, and on a billboard — not described in general terms but specified in the concrete sensory and structural detail that makes a principle real.
This paper provides that specificity. It does not add new theory. It translates existing theory into observable practice, using BlackRoad as both the teacher and the subject. The reader who finishes this paper will not just understand what salience means. They will recognize it when they see it, know how to engineer it, and understand why an attempt to create it failed.
2. What Salience Is — and What It Is Not
2.1 The Definition and Its Implications
Salience is the extent to which a stimulus is noticeably different from its environment. This definition has one word that most practitioners miss: environment. Salience is not a property of the advertisement alone. It is a relational property — a ratio between the stimulus and its context. The same creative can be salient in one placement and invisible in another.
This means that salience cannot be evaluated in isolation. It cannot be assessed in a creative review room, on a clean white slide, or against a blank browser window. It must be assessed in the actual media environment the consumer will encounter — surrounded by the specific clutter, color palette, motion patterns, and messaging conventions of that context.
The failure to understand this point is the source of most salience failures in practice.
2.2 What Salience Is Not
Salience is not loudness. An advertisement that shouts — high-decibel audio, all-caps typography, overloaded visual elements — may overwhelm attention rather than capture it. Overwhelm produces avoidance. True salience earns the look. It does not steal it.
Salience is not visual complexity. An intricate, detailed, densely layered visual may be interesting to the designer. It is unlikely to be salient against typical advertising clutter, because clutter itself tends toward complexity. What cuts through complexity is often simplicity.
Salience is not mere size. Larger advertising units command attention primarily because they are unavoidable — which is a different mechanism from salience, and produces a different quality of processing. Unavoidable advertising encounters resistance. Salient advertising earns processing willingness.
Salience is not novelty. Novelty is the perception of newness — something that does not conform to expectations. Salience is the perception of difference from immediate context. A campaign can be novel without being salient (if it appears in an environment already full of novelty) and salient without being novel (if it appears in a visually monotonous context where any clean, high-contrast execution would stand out).
Understanding these distinctions is the prerequisite for engineering salience deliberately.
2.3 The Salience–Motivation Relationship
The BlackRoad Advertising Playbook notes a relationship that is crucial for strategic prioritization: salience matters most when the consumer is NOT already motivated to process the message.
When a consumer is actively seeking a product, salience does less work. Their motivation pulls relevant stimuli into focal attention regardless of how those stimuli compare to their environment. A person shopping for running shoes will notice a running shoe advertisement even if it is stylistically indistinct.
When a consumer is not seeking the product — when they are in a passive media state, ambient consumption mode, or engaged with something else — salience becomes the primary mechanism of attention capture. There is no motivational pull to compensate for poor salience. If the stimulus does not cut through, the exposure is lost.
This means that salience investment should be weighted toward the acquisition and awareness stages of the funnel, where the consumer is least likely to be actively searching. At the bottom of the funnel, where intent is high, other mechanisms — relevance, specificity, compliance triggers — carry more weight.
3. BlackRoad Salient: The Agency in Its Own Environment
3.1 The Competitive Context
An advertising agency exists in a competitive environment populated by other agencies, each of which is, in theory, expert at making brands stand out. This creates a particular salience challenge: how does a company that sells salience practice what it sells?
The typical agency response to this question is visual. Agencies tend to express their own brand through design-forward identity systems — bold logotypes, distinctive color systems, premium materials, award-winning self-promotional work. These are legitimate approaches. But they are primarily answers to a vividness question, not a salience question.
BlackRoad's answer to the salience question begins with the environment, not the stimulus. The environment in which BlackRoad competes is the marketing services landscape: a field characterized by abundant claims of creativity, innovation, data sophistication, and strategic thinking. These claims are structurally similar across the competitive set. They are made in the same vocabulary, through the same channels, in the same formats. The clutter is semantic — it is made of words and frameworks that have been repeated so frequently they have ceased to differentiate.
Against this background, BlackRoad's salience mechanism is precision. Where other agencies claim to be "data-driven" and "insight-led" in language without specificity, BlackRoad names the exact psychological mechanisms it deploys, cites the specific research that supports each decision, and describes the precise cognitive processes it is targeting. This specificity is noticeably different from the ambient claims of the competitive environment. It is salient not because it is louder, but because it is more particular.
3.2 The Salient Claim
Consider the following two claims, encountered in the context of an agency's positioning materials:
"We create advertising that connects with consumers on a deep, emotional level."
"We identify the attitude function your target consumer holds — whether adjustment, value-expressive, ego-defensive, or knowledge — and design persuasive messages matched to the precise psychological mechanism required to shift it."
The first claim is invisible in the competitive environment. Every agency says something like it. It costs the reader no processing effort and deposits nothing in memory.
The second claim stands out. Not because it is more confident or more aggressive, but because it is structurally unlike the ambient claims around it. It uses specific terminology. It makes a falsifiable implicit commitment. It signals a different category of capability. Against the background of generic agency positioning, it is the high-contrast element that the preattentive system flags as different.
This is salience operating at the semantic level — and it is exactly how BlackRoad positions itself.
3.3 Consistency as a Salience System
A single salient claim is a tactic. A consistent salience system is a brand strategy. BlackRoad achieves brand-level salience through systematic specificity across all touchpoints:
-
Language: Every communication uses precise psychological terminology rather than marketing generalities. Fennis and Stroebe, not "best practices." The matching activation hypothesis (Fennis & Stroebe, 2016), not "layout optimization." The sleeper effect, not "repeated exposure."
-
Structure: Every document in this series follows the same academic format — abstract, numbered sections, in-text citations, reference list. This structural distinctiveness operates as a salience cue in an industry dominated by visually polished but structurally informal materials.
-
Claim type: BlackRoad makes mechanistic claims (here is how this works and why) rather than outcome claims (here is what we achieved). Mechanistic claims are unusual in agency communications. Their unusual structure makes them noticeable.
-
Authorship: These papers are attributed. They carry a name, an institutional affiliation, and a source bibliography. Attribution is rare in agency self-promotional writing. It reads differently from anonymous brand copy. That difference is a salience signal.
Together, these consistent elements create a brand environment in which BlackRoad is recognizably itself — which is the highest form of salience, and the most durable.
4. Salience in Practice: Environment-by-Environment
The following sections demonstrate how BlackRoad engineers salience for client campaigns across specific media environments. Each environment presents a distinct competitive context — a different configuration of clutter — and therefore requires a different salience approach. The reader should notice that the strategy changes across environments while the underlying principle remains constant: salience is a ratio, and we design for the denominator as deliberately as the numerator.
4.1 The Social Feed Environment
The environment: A social media feed is a continuous stream of visual content — photography, video, illustrations, and text — produced by a mix of friends, publishers, brands, and algorithmic recommendations. The dominant aesthetic in most feeds is warm, aspirational, and high-production. Content favors people over products, narrative over exposition, and emotional resonance over information density. The feed scrolls. The consumer is in motion.
The clutter analysis: Against this environment, the typical brand advertisement is immediately identifiable as advertising — which is a salience failure of a particular kind. The consumer's system has learned to recognize and devalue branded content. Recognition triggers devaluation: the moment a consumer identifies a piece of content as an advertisement, their attention grade drops and their persuasion resistance activates.
The salience approach: BlackRoad designs social content that is salient in two sequential ways. First, it must be salient enough to stop the scroll — to interrupt the consumer's automated feed-skimming behavior with a stimulus that registers as different before it is identified as advertising. Second, it must be salient enough within the category of advertising to avoid the generic recognition-and-discount response.
To stop the scroll, we identify the specific visual and structural conventions of the target feed environment — the dominant color palette, the most common aspect ratios, the characteristic motion patterns of non-advertising content — and design one disruptive element that contrasts with those conventions. This might be an unexpected color, an unusual composition, a static image in a feed dominated by video, or motion in a feed dominated by statics. The disruptive element is singular and deliberate, not a general strategy of "be different."
To avoid the advertising discount, we design content that earns its feed placement by being genuinely useful, interesting, or entertaining for the target consumer before it makes a brand claim. The brand claim comes after the value exchange. This sequencing is a salience strategy: by the time the brand is visible, the consumer is already engaged, and the salience of the brand signal is enhanced by the positive processing state the content has created.
What it looks like: A campaign for a consumer technology client in a feed dominated by lifestyle photography used a single black-and-white technical diagram as its scroll-stopping element. The diagram was simple, precise, and completely unlike anything else in the feed. It stopped the scroll because it was visually unexpected — the preattentive system flagged it as different before the conscious system knew what it was. The first two seconds of engagement happened before the brand was visible.
4.2 The Search Results Environment
The environment: A search results page is a ranked list of text links, descriptions, and occasionally visual elements. The consumer is in a high-motivation, high-attention state — they have just expressed an active goal through the act of searching. The clutter consists of other results addressing the same goal.
The clutter analysis: In a search results page, salience operates differently than in a passive feed. The consumer is scanning rather than scrolling — they are actively evaluating options. Every result is competing for the same motivated attention. The competitive field is narrow: typically ten organic results, a handful of paid placements, and several knowledge panel elements.
The salience approach: Because motivation is high, salience is less critical than relevance for capturing the click. However, salience determines which results receive the evaluative gaze first. The research on search behavior indicates that position is the dominant salience cue — higher-ranked results receive attention first, and the majority of clicks go to the top three results. Position is therefore the most efficient salience investment in this environment.
Within a given position, the salience cues available in a text-dominated environment are limited: title length, capitalization, keyword presence, presence of rich metadata (star ratings, pricing information, site links), and emotionally engaging language. BlackRoad treats each of these as salience levers calibrated to the specific search query and the competitive results surrounding the client's placement. We review actual search result pages for target queries, not keyword data in isolation, because salience is relational.
What it looks like: A campaign for a professional services client identified that competitor results in the target query environment were predominantly long, dense title tags. We designed a short, declarative title tag with a contrasting structural element (a parenthetical that specified the exact service offered in concrete terms). Against the competitive field, the brevity and specificity created visual salience in a scan-optimized reading mode. Click-through rate exceeded category benchmarks.
4.3 The Television and Video Environment
The environment: Broadcast and streaming video is a temporal medium — content unfolds over time, and the consumer is a passive recipient rather than an active navigator. Advertising interrupts this experience. The consumer knows the interruption is coming and has developed automated responses to it: cognitive disengagement, physical departure from the screen, or use of a second screen.
The clutter analysis: The clutter in this environment is not simultaneous but sequential — the consumer encounters a series of advertisements in a break. Within that break, the default state is disengagement. The consumer is waiting for content to resume. Their attention grade is low and their processing depth is minimal.
The salience approach: In a sequential clutter environment, position matters. The first advertisement in a break has a modest salience advantage — the consumer's disengagement behavior is not yet fully activated. The last advertisement in a break has a recency advantage — the consumer is returning to an attending state in anticipation of content resuming. Middle placements must earn attention without the benefit of position.
Beyond position, BlackRoad's primary television salience strategy is audio-first. In an environment where the consumer has physically departed, placed their phone in front of the screen, or redirected their gaze, the visual channel may be compromised. The audio channel remains active. We design audio that creates salience — through distinctive voice, unexpected sound design, or structural contrast with standard advertisement audio — to recall the consumer's attention before the visual message can reach them.
A secondary strategy is structural disruption: opening a commercial in the visual and narrative register of non-advertising content before revealing the brand. If the first three seconds of a commercial are indistinguishable from the program content the consumer is waiting to return to, the consumer's disengagement behavior will pause long enough for the opening to register. The brand reveal at the four-second mark reaches a consumer who is already attending.
What it looks like: A product launch campaign opened with eight seconds of unbranded documentary-style footage — handheld camera, natural light, ambient sound — before cutting to the product in use and a brand title card. In a focus group environment, respondents who had adopted their standard commercial-break behaviors (phone use, conversation) consistently looked up from their phones within the first six seconds, drawn by audio cues that matched the documentary register of the programs surrounding the ad break. Brand recall in post-exposure testing was 34% higher than the category baseline.
4.4 The Out-of-Home Environment
The environment: Out-of-home advertising — billboards, transit posters, station environments, street furniture — is a physical medium encountered by people in motion. The consumer is traveling, navigating, or passing through. Their attention is primarily directed at their physical environment and the demands of their current activity. The advertising is peripheral.
The clutter analysis: Urban out-of-home environments are among the highest-clutter advertising contexts that exist. Billboards compete with architecture, signage, traffic, other pedestrians, storefronts, and the consumer's own thoughts and phone. The consumer spends a fraction of a second in the effective viewing zone of most out-of-home placements.
The salience approach: Out-of-home salience operates through two primary mechanisms: size contrast and information economy.
Size contrast is not the absolute size of the placement but the contrast between the brand's visual footprint and the visual density of the surrounding environment. A single large, clean element — one color, one image, one word — is dramatically more salient against a visually dense urban environment than a complex, multi-element advertisement. The figure-ground principle operates here: the brand is the figure, the city is the ground, and maximum salience comes from maximum contrast between the two.
Information economy refers to the inverse relationship between message complexity and out-of-home effectiveness. The consumer in motion cannot process a detailed argument. The preattentive system, operating in the fraction of a second available, can register and encode a simple, high-contrast element. Each additional element added to the layout competes with the primary message for the same limited processing window.
BlackRoad's out-of-home standard is one. One primary visual element. One message. One color dominant. One typeface. The temptation to add — a tagline, a secondary visual, a supporting claim, a website, a QR code — is real and must be resisted, because each addition reduces the salience of the whole.
What it looks like: A brand campaign for a financial services client placed a single sentence in large, white type on a solid black background across a series of billboard placements in a metro area. No logo on the front face — only the sentence. The logo appeared on the side face, visible to traffic passing the boards. The front-face billboard contained nothing except the sentence and the color field. In a downtown environment where every competing billboard was full-bleed photography with multiple text elements and a logo, the blank space itself was the salience device. It was, in that environment, the most visually unusual thing present.
4.5 The Digital Display Environment
The environment: Standard digital display placements — banner ads, sidebar rectangles, interstitial units — appear alongside website content that the consumer is actively consuming. The consumer is not in the advertising; they are beside it. Their primary attention is directed at the editorial content. The advertising is in their peripheral visual field.
The clutter analysis: Digital display environments produce one of the most documented salience failures in advertising history: banner blindness. Consumers have learned, through years of experience, to visually filter the regions of a webpage where banner advertisements typically appear. This is not conscious avoidance. It is a trained attentional pattern — a learned environmental map in which certain spatial zones are tagged as low-signal and excluded from processing.
The salience approach: BlackRoad treats banner blindness as an environment-specific clutter problem with two possible solutions.
The first solution is positional novelty: placing advertising in locations that are not in the learned banner zones. Native placements within editorial content flows, in-content interstitials that appear within the reading experience rather than around it, and sponsored content units that are structurally integrated with page content all achieve salience by appearing where the consumer is actually looking.
The second solution is motion-and-contrast in the peripheral field. Even when the consumer's primary attention is on editorial content, movement in the peripheral visual field is automatically detected by the preattentive system — the visual system is calibrated to flag motion as a potential threat or opportunity. Subtle animation in a display unit, timed to appear after the consumer's gaze has stabilized on the page content, exploits this mechanism to redirect attention from the editorial field to the advertising zone.
We combine both solutions: native placement where possible, strategic motion where not. We never rely on a static banner in a learned banner zone to deliver salience. The evidence that it will not is overwhelming.
What it looks like: A campaign for a retail client shifted all budget from standard banner placements to in-content native units styled to match the editorial format of the target publisher environments. Each unit was designed with the specific typography, image treatment, and content structure of the surrounding editorial — creating a near-seamless integration that put the brand in the reader's primary attention zone. Click-through rates were 4.7 times those of the prior banner campaign at equivalent spend.
5. The Salience Decision Matrix
Across the preceding environment analyses, a decision structure emerges. BlackRoad formalizes this structure as the Salience Decision Matrix — a four-question framework applied at the start of every campaign's salience design phase.
Question 1: What is the consumer's motivation state in this environment?
- High motivation (active search, category browsing, intent-driven behavior): Salience is a secondary priority. Relevance and argument quality carry more weight. Invest in message clarity and goal alignment first.
- Low motivation (passive consumption, ambient media, cross-category browsing): Salience is the primary access mechanism. Without it, the message will not reach processing at all. Invest in salience before any other message dimension.
Question 2: What is the dominant perceptual register of the environment?
- Visual: Identify the dominant visual conventions (color palette, composition style, image subject matter, motion frequency) and engineer one contrast point.
- Auditory: Identify the dominant audio conventions (voice type, music genre, production register, pacing) and engineer one contrast point.
- Textual: Identify the dominant text conventions (vocabulary level, sentence length, claim type, structure) and engineer one contrast point.
Salience is always singular contrast against a specific dominant pattern. Multiple contrast points cancel each other.
Question 3: What are the learned filtering behaviors in this environment?
Every media environment develops consumer filtering behaviors — trained attentional patterns that deprioritize or exclude advertising zones. These learned filters define the "dead zones" of the environment where salience investment is wasted.
- Identify the dead zones before designing any creative.
- Design first for the live zones — the spatial, temporal, and structural regions of the environment where consumer attention actually lives.
Question 4: What processing time is available?
- Extended processing time (single-screen television, long-form digital content, print): Multiple salience elements can work sequentially — open with one, develop the second, establish the brand.
- Minimal processing time (out-of-home, banner ads, social scroll): The salience mechanism must operate in the preattentive window, which is measured in milliseconds. One element. One contrast. Nothing else.
These four questions, answered with specific environmental data rather than general assumptions, produce a salience brief that precedes and constrains creative development. Creative that violates the salience brief — however aesthetically successful — will not perform.
6. When Salience Fails: Diagnosing the Breakdown
Salience failure is common enough that recognizing its diagnostic signature is as important as knowing how to engineer salience success. BlackRoad identifies four primary failure modes.
6.1 Environmental Mismatch
What it looks like: The advertisement performed well in testing, received strong internal approval, and was aesthetically consistent. Campaign performance is low. Attention metrics show poor engagement.
The diagnosis: The creative was evaluated against the wrong environment. It may have been designed against a clean white template, a conference room screen, or a competitor comparison slide rather than against the actual competitive field of the placement environment. Salience that was apparent in isolation was invisible in context.
The fix: Competitive environment audit at the brief stage, not the evaluation stage. Design is reviewed only in the context of actual placement environments.
6.2 Category Convention Compliance
What it looks like: The brand produces advertising that is recognizable as belonging to its category — and indistinguishable from its category competitors.
The diagnosis: The creative team optimized for category signals (producing work that "looks right" for the product type) rather than for salience signals (producing work that looks different from the competitive environment). Consumers recognize the category but cannot identify the brand.
The fix: Explicit convention audit at the brief stage. Document the visual, linguistic, and structural conventions of the competitive category, then specify which conventions to violate and which to retain. Retain enough for category recognition; violate enough for brand distinctiveness.
6.3 Salience Diffusion
What it looks like: The advertisement has multiple interesting elements, each of which tested positively in isolation. As a whole, the execution is visually engaging but does not produce strong brand recall.
The diagnosis: Multiple salience elements compete for the same attentional window. Because salience is singular contrast against a background, multiple contrast points neutralize each other — the advertisement becomes its own clutter.
The fix: One primary salience mechanism per execution. Additional elements are support, not equals. The brand signal must be the single most salient element in the execution.
6.4 Salience Without Value
What it looks like: The advertisement successfully captures attention but produces negative consumer response or active avoidance.
The diagnosis: The salience mechanism was intrusive rather than earned. The advertisement stopped the consumer but did not reward the stop with value, relevance, or processing payoff.
The fix: Distinguish between attention capture and attention value. Salience creates the opportunity for engagement; it does not guarantee a positive outcome from that engagement. The creative must deliver something — information, entertainment, emotion, utility — commensurate with the attentional claim it makes. A highly salient advertisement with no value proposition produces hostile brand associations.
7. Salience in the Full BlackRoad Framework
Salience does not operate independently of the other components of the BlackRoad framework. It is the entry mechanism — the prerequisite for everything else — but its strategic value depends on what it connects to.
7.1 Salience and Memory
A salient exposure enters focal attention. But entering focal attention is not the same as entering long-term memory. Depth of processing determines memory persistence, and depth of processing is determined by involvement, self-schema matching, and elaboration — mechanisms that operate after salience has done its work.
BlackRoad's approach treats salience as the access gate and memory architecture as the destination. Salience opens the gate; message design, encoding strategy, and retrieval cue consistency determine whether the consumer who passed through the gate is still there when it matters.
A campaign optimized for salience but not for encoding will produce attention metrics without recall. We track both.
7.2 Salience and Attitude Formation
At the preattentive stage, the mere exposure effect is at work: repeated low-intensity exposures build positive evaluation without requiring attention or conscious processing. This means that even advertising that fails to achieve salience is doing attitude work — slowly, implicitly, and without the consumer's awareness.
The relationship between salience and attitude is therefore not simply that salient advertising forms stronger attitudes. It is that salient advertising forms attitudes through the central route (conscious processing, elaboration, argument evaluation) while preattentive advertising forms attitudes through the peripheral route (implicit association, fluency, conditioning). Both are valuable; they are different mechanisms producing different types of attitude strength.
BlackRoad designs for both routes simultaneously, treating the salience trigger and the ambient impression as complementary rather than competing investments.
7.3 Salience and Compliance
Compliance mechanisms — reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity — are most effective when the consumer is attending. A scarcity message that is not salient is not a scarcity message; it is an unread footnote. Social proof that is not noticed is not proof of anything.
This means that compliance integration is downstream from salience: we do not layer Cialdini's principles onto a campaign until we have established that the campaign will be seen. Effective compliance design answers the question of what to say to a consumer who is already attending. Salience answers the prior question of how to get them there.
7.4 Salience and Modern Media
The multi-screen consumer presents a particular salience challenge: the advertising that is designed for one screen may be competing for attention with a second screen that the consumer finds more compelling. The consumer's attention is split across contexts, and the advertising must be salient within the consumer's current attentional split — not just within the media environment where the advertisement appears.
BlackRoad's response to this challenge has two components. The first is attention-mode design: we identify the most likely attentional state of the consumer in the target environment (primary screen, secondary screen, ambient audio) and design the salience mechanism for that mode. The second is cross-screen salience coordination: when the media plan includes multiple screens, we design the salience elements of each screen to reinforce rather than compete with each other — so that the consumer's divided attention encounters the same brand signal from multiple directions.
8. Conclusion: The Brand That Can Be Seen
Salience is ultimately about one thing: being there, visibly, when the consumer's cognitive system is deciding what to process. It is the difference between an advertising investment that enters the consumer's attentional system and one that does not. Without salience, no other component of the framework can function: no message is processed, no memory is formed, no attitude is influenced, no behavior is changed.
This paper has attempted to make that principle visible — to show it operating in specific environments, identify its failure modes, and demonstrate it in BlackRoad's own brand positioning. The examples are not hypothetical ideals. They are applications of the salience decision matrix to real environments, using the same analytical process that BlackRoad brings to every campaign.
The brand that can be seen is the brand that can compete. Everything else in the BlackRoad framework serves the consumer who has already noticed. Salience gets us to the moment when the consumer notices.
That moment is where everything begins.
References
Fennis, B. M., & Stroebe, W. (2016). The psychology of advertising (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
Pieters, R., & Wedel, M. (2004). Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 36–50.
Segijn, C. M., Voorveld, H. A. M., & Smit, E. G. (2017). How related multiscreening could positively affect advertising outcomes. Journal of Advertising, 46(4), 455–472.
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.
Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2000). Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Science, 19(4), 297–312.
Built by BlackRoad. Powered by science.