Mission · 1849 worldbuild · solo session
Mission room
4 threads running in parallel. Two agents, one provider model, one local model — comparing how each handles the same query about Sierra mortality figures.
Active threads
4
2 running · 2 paused
Agents in mission
5
br-native · scoped
Models
3
2 provider · 1 local
Memory candidates
7
review pending
Handoffs queued
3
to RoadBook · RoadCode · RoadWire
Parallel threads · 4same mission · different intelligences
LucidiaAGENT · ORCHESTRATOR
RUNNING
Holding the mission state. Tracking 4 threads, 3 handoffs, 7 memory candidates. Suggests Cordelia reply on Bancroft is the strongest for citation.
TASK · orchestrate · score · memory triage
CordeliaAGENT · RESEARCH
RUNNING
"Comparing Parkman 1849 against Stewart 1936 — Parkman has the narrower confidence band (±3%) on November mortality. Recommend using Parkman as primary, Stewart as secondary."
TASK · source confidence on 1849 figures
Claude 4.7PROVIDER · ANTHROPIC
IDLE
"For a marching-band-style RoadWorld scenario, you'd want to model the 4 Bancroft diaries as event streams rather than static reference. Want me to sketch the data shape?"
TASK · scenario shape · roadworld
GPT-4oPROVIDER · OPENAI
IDLE
"Three diaries give you triangulation. Suggest weighting by source proximity — Parkman 0.5, Reed 0.3, the two Donner-adjacent 0.1 each. Confidence intervals naturally follow."
TASK · weighting scheme · 4 sources
Qwen 3 · 32BLOCAL · MLX · M2 MAX
PAUSED
"My take is narrower — without the secondary literature I'd lean on Parkman alone and treat Stewart's range as the upper bound. I lack the Bancroft holdings beyond what was attached."
TASK · offline cross-check · narrow reading
RoadieAGENT · WRITER
RUNNING
Drafting the Nov–Feb timeline against Cordelia's saved primaries. Needs WRITE_REPO grant on
roadworld/1849/timeline.md — awaiting your approval in CarKeys.TASK · draft timeline.md · cite as you go
Compare · Claude vs GPT-4o vs Qwen Localsame prompt · 3 responses
PROMPT / DIMENSION
CLAUDE 4.7
GPT-4O
QWEN LOCAL
Weights the 4 sources
By proximity + corroboration. Suggests event-stream framing.
Specific: 0.5 / 0.3 / 0.1 / 0.1. Concrete numbers.
Won't weight — uses Parkman alone. Lacks Bancroft access.
Confidence interval
Implied via streams, no number given.
Computes from weights: ±5.4%
Uses Stewart's ±8% as upper bound.
Output length
2.1 KB
1.8 KB
920 B · offline
Cost · this turn
14 USAGE units
9 USAGE units
0 USAGE · LOCAL
Best for
Framing / structure
Numeric weighting
Offline conservative reading
Handoffs queued · 3awaiting your approval before send
RoadBook · 4 sources + citations
RoadCode · timeline.md draft
RoadWire · mission summary