Organize research library and schemas
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
# Regulated Industry Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
The finance automation vision is conceptual and aspirational; it is not a claim of compliance. The design aims to align with GAAP/IFRS expectations and regulatory frameworks such as FINRA and SEC while preserving flexibility for jurisdictional variation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Accounting Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
- **GAAP/IFRS hooks:** Journal entry structures can map to ledger postings and disclosures, supporting external reporting pipelines.
|
||||
- **Controls:** Segregation of duties and PS-SHA∞ journaling provide traceability for approvals and policy overrides.
|
||||
|
||||
## Regulatory Overlays
|
||||
|
||||
- **FINRA/SEC:** Suitability, best execution, market surveillance, and recordkeeping requirements inform orchestration rules and logging depth.
|
||||
- **AML/KYC:** Agents should integrate identity verification and suspicious activity patterns, with contradictions escalated when risk flags collide with revenue objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
## Posture Statement
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conceptual only:** These documents describe intended capabilities, not audited compliance states.
|
||||
- **Evidence-ready:** The combination of journaled actions and explicit contradiction handling is designed to support future attestations.
|
||||
|
||||
## TODOs
|
||||
|
||||
- Map specific regulatory controls to agent responsibilities and PS-SHA∞ fields.
|
||||
- Draft sample audit trails demonstrating how finance workflows surface and resolve conflicts.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user