Organize research library and schemas
This commit is contained in:
26
papers/finance-automation/automated-finance-architecture.md
Normal file
26
papers/finance-automation/automated-finance-architecture.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
# Automated Finance Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
BlackRoad OS models finance automation through orchestrated agents that mirror traditional corporate finance controls while remaining auditable via PS-SHA∞ journaling. The architecture centers on eight core finance agents coordinated by a finance orchestrator and exposed through API and Prism views.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Components
|
||||
|
||||
- **Finance orchestrator:** Routes tasks, enforces segregation of duties, and coordinates PS-SHA∞ logging.
|
||||
- **Core agents:** Close, treasury, FP&A, procurement, compliance, tax, reporting, and controls agents handle domain-specific actions.
|
||||
- **API + Prism views:** External interfaces for ingesting events, triggering workflows, and surfacing journaled outcomes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference Foundations
|
||||
|
||||
- **Corporate finance literature:** Valuation, risk, and capital structure concepts from Brealey and OpenStax guide agent policies and scenario modeling.
|
||||
- **Regulatory expectations:** FINRA/SEC focuses on suitability, surveillance, and market integrity influence orchestration rules.
|
||||
- **Automation handbooks:** Industrial automation patterns inform safety constraints, redundancy, and recovery strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
## PS-SHA∞ Integration
|
||||
|
||||
- Every financial action is journaled with hashes and prior links to preserve an auditable worldline.
|
||||
- Contradictions between agents (e.g., revenue vs. compliance) are recorded with resolution metadata.
|
||||
- Journal entries can be exported for external attestations or compliance tooling.
|
||||
|
||||
## TODOs
|
||||
|
||||
- Elaborate data contracts for each agent API and align with `schemas/journal-entry.schema.json`.
|
||||
- Prototype scenario simulations to stress-test segregation-of-duties policies.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
# Regulated Industry Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
The finance automation vision is conceptual and aspirational; it is not a claim of compliance. The design aims to align with GAAP/IFRS expectations and regulatory frameworks such as FINRA and SEC while preserving flexibility for jurisdictional variation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Accounting Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
- **GAAP/IFRS hooks:** Journal entry structures can map to ledger postings and disclosures, supporting external reporting pipelines.
|
||||
- **Controls:** Segregation of duties and PS-SHA∞ journaling provide traceability for approvals and policy overrides.
|
||||
|
||||
## Regulatory Overlays
|
||||
|
||||
- **FINRA/SEC:** Suitability, best execution, market surveillance, and recordkeeping requirements inform orchestration rules and logging depth.
|
||||
- **AML/KYC:** Agents should integrate identity verification and suspicious activity patterns, with contradictions escalated when risk flags collide with revenue objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
## Posture Statement
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conceptual only:** These documents describe intended capabilities, not audited compliance states.
|
||||
- **Evidence-ready:** The combination of journaled actions and explicit contradiction handling is designed to support future attestations.
|
||||
|
||||
## TODOs
|
||||
|
||||
- Map specific regulatory controls to agent responsibilities and PS-SHA∞ fields.
|
||||
- Draft sample audit trails demonstrating how finance workflows surface and resolve conflicts.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user