Initial commit — RoadCode import
This commit is contained in:
751
03-TRADING-COMPLIANCE-PLAYBOOK.md
Normal file
751
03-TRADING-COMPLIANCE-PLAYBOOK.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,751 @@
|
||||
# 📊 TRADING COMPLIANCE & SUPERVISION PLAYBOOK
|
||||
**BlackRoad OS, Inc. - Trading Supervision Framework**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||||
|
||||
1. [Trade Supervision Overview](#trade-supervision-overview)
|
||||
2. [Pre-Trade Supervision](#pre-trade-supervision)
|
||||
3. [Trade Execution Monitoring](#trade-execution-monitoring)
|
||||
4. [Post-Trade Review](#post-trade-review)
|
||||
5. [Suitability Analysis](#suitability-analysis)
|
||||
6. [Churning Detection](#churning-detection)
|
||||
7. [Options Supervision](#options-supervision)
|
||||
8. [Margin Account Monitoring](#margin-account-monitoring)
|
||||
9. [Automated Surveillance](#automated-surveillance)
|
||||
10. [Exception Handling](#exception-handling)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## TRADE SUPERVISION OVERVIEW
|
||||
|
||||
### Three Lines of Defense
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ SUPERVISION MODEL │
|
||||
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ LINE 1: REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE │
|
||||
│ ├─ Know Your Customer │
|
||||
│ ├─ Suitability determination │
|
||||
│ ├─ Reasonable basis suitability │
|
||||
│ ├─ Customer-specific suitability │
|
||||
│ └─ Quantitative suitability │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ LINE 2: BRANCH/SUPERVISORY PRINCIPAL │
|
||||
│ ├─ Daily trade review │
|
||||
│ ├─ Exception investigation │
|
||||
│ ├─ Pattern recognition │
|
||||
│ ├─ Representative oversight │
|
||||
│ └─ Escalation to compliance │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ LINE 3: COMPLIANCE/CCO │
|
||||
│ ├─ Surveillance system monitoring │
|
||||
│ ├─ Testing and auditing │
|
||||
│ ├─ Regulatory reporting │
|
||||
│ ├─ Policy enforcement │
|
||||
│ └─ Disciplinary actions │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Supervision Principles (FINRA Rule 3110)
|
||||
|
||||
**REASONABLE SUPERVISION:**
|
||||
- Written Supervisory Procedures (WSPs)
|
||||
- Designation of supervisors
|
||||
- Adequate resources
|
||||
- Regular reviews
|
||||
- Exception investigation
|
||||
- Enforcement of policies
|
||||
- Adaptation to risks
|
||||
|
||||
**SUPERVISION FREQUENCY:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
DAILY:
|
||||
├─ Trade review (all trades)
|
||||
├─ New account approvals
|
||||
├─ Correspondence review (sample)
|
||||
└─ Exception reports
|
||||
|
||||
WEEKLY:
|
||||
├─ Outside business activity monitoring
|
||||
├─ Private securities transactions review
|
||||
├─ Gifts & entertainment review
|
||||
└─ Advertising review
|
||||
|
||||
MONTHLY:
|
||||
├─ High-risk account review
|
||||
├─ Options activity review
|
||||
├─ Margin account review
|
||||
└─ Representative activity review
|
||||
|
||||
QUARTERLY:
|
||||
├─ Branch inspections (if applicable)
|
||||
├─ Representative meetings
|
||||
├─ Compliance testing
|
||||
└─ Policy updates
|
||||
|
||||
ANNUAL:
|
||||
├─ WSP annual review
|
||||
├─ Compliance report to CEO
|
||||
├─ Representative certifications
|
||||
└─ Comprehensive audit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## PRE-TRADE SUPERVISION
|
||||
|
||||
### New Account Approval
|
||||
|
||||
**TIMELINE:** Within 30 days of account opening
|
||||
|
||||
**Principal Review Checklist:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
☐ Customer information complete
|
||||
☐ Name, address, DOB, SSN
|
||||
☐ Employment/occupation
|
||||
☐ Investment objectives
|
||||
☐ Risk tolerance
|
||||
☐ Time horizon
|
||||
☐ Liquidity needs
|
||||
☐ Tax status
|
||||
☐ Investment experience
|
||||
☐ Annual income
|
||||
☐ Net worth (excluding primary residence)
|
||||
☐ Liquid net worth
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Suitability information adequate for recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
☐ CIP verification completed
|
||||
☐ Government ID obtained
|
||||
☐ Identity verified
|
||||
☐ OFAC screening passed
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Account type appropriate
|
||||
☐ Individual, joint, entity, retirement
|
||||
☐ Cash, margin, options (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Special situations addressed
|
||||
☐ Senior investor (65+) - enhanced review
|
||||
☐ Military servicemember - SCRA compliance
|
||||
☐ Employee account - approval obtained
|
||||
☐ Politically exposed person - EDD completed
|
||||
☐ Institutional account - verification completed
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Account agreements signed
|
||||
☐ Customer agreement
|
||||
☐ Margin agreement (if applicable)
|
||||
☐ Options agreement (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Disclosures provided
|
||||
☐ Fee schedule
|
||||
☐ Conflicts of interest
|
||||
☐ Regulation Best Interest (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Principal approval documented
|
||||
☐ Signature
|
||||
☐ Date (within 30 days)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Options Account Approval
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Before Options Trading:**
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Options Agreement:**
|
||||
- Signed by customer
|
||||
- Within 15 days of approval
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Options Disclosure Document (ODD):**
|
||||
- "Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options"
|
||||
- Provided before or at account approval
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Suitability Determination:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
OPTIONS SUITABILITY FACTORS:
|
||||
├─ Knowledge of options (experience)
|
||||
├─ Trading experience (years)
|
||||
├─ Financial situation (income, net worth)
|
||||
├─ Risk tolerance (ability to sustain losses)
|
||||
├─ Investment objectives
|
||||
├─ Account type (IRA restrictions)
|
||||
└─ Proposed options strategies
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Options Level Assignment:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
LEVEL 1: COVERED CALLS/CASH-SECURED PUTS
|
||||
├─ Lowest risk
|
||||
├─ Limited loss exposure
|
||||
└─ Suitable for conservative investors
|
||||
|
||||
LEVEL 2: LONG CALLS/PUTS (BUYING ONLY)
|
||||
├─ Moderate risk
|
||||
├─ Loss limited to premium paid
|
||||
└─ Suitable for moderate investors
|
||||
|
||||
LEVEL 3: SPREADS
|
||||
├─ Increased complexity
|
||||
├─ Defined risk strategies
|
||||
└─ Suitable for experienced investors
|
||||
|
||||
LEVEL 4: NAKED WRITING (UNCOVERED)
|
||||
├─ Highest risk
|
||||
├─ Unlimited loss potential (calls)
|
||||
├─ Substantial loss potential (puts)
|
||||
├─ Margin requirements
|
||||
└─ Suitable only for sophisticated investors with:
|
||||
• High income ($100K+)
|
||||
• High net worth ($250K+)
|
||||
• Significant options experience
|
||||
• Demonstrated understanding of risks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Principal Approval - Options:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# OPTIONS ACCOUNT APPROVAL
|
||||
|
||||
Customer: __________________ Account: __________
|
||||
|
||||
Options Level Requested: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4
|
||||
|
||||
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS:
|
||||
Investment Objective: ________________________
|
||||
Risk Tolerance: ☐ Conservative ☐ Moderate ☐ Aggressive
|
||||
Annual Income: $__________
|
||||
Net Worth: $__________
|
||||
Liquid Net Worth: $__________
|
||||
Investment Experience: _____ years
|
||||
Options Experience: _____ years
|
||||
Options Knowledge: ☐ Limited ☐ Good ☐ Extensive
|
||||
|
||||
LEVEL DETERMINATION:
|
||||
Based on customer profile, approved for Level: ____
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Customer financial situation supports options trading
|
||||
☐ Customer knowledge/experience appropriate for level
|
||||
☐ Options Disclosure Document provided
|
||||
☐ Options Agreement to be signed within 15 days
|
||||
|
||||
PRINCIPAL APPROVAL:
|
||||
Approved by: __________________ Date: ________
|
||||
Signature: _________________
|
||||
|
||||
NOTES:
|
||||
___________________________________________
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## TRADE EXECUTION MONITORING
|
||||
|
||||
### Order Entry Controls
|
||||
|
||||
**Pre-Trade Checks (Automated):**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def pre_trade_validation(order):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Automated checks before order execution
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# 1. Account validation
|
||||
if not account.is_approved():
|
||||
return REJECT("Account not approved by principal")
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. Account type validation
|
||||
if order.security_type == "OPTION":
|
||||
if not account.options_approved:
|
||||
return REJECT("Options not approved")
|
||||
if order.strategy.level > account.options_level:
|
||||
return REJECT("Options level insufficient")
|
||||
|
||||
# 3. Margin validation
|
||||
if order.requires_margin():
|
||||
if not account.margin_approved:
|
||||
return REJECT("Margin not approved")
|
||||
if account.buying_power < order.estimated_cost:
|
||||
return REJECT("Insufficient buying power")
|
||||
|
||||
# 4. Position limits
|
||||
if order.would_exceed_position_limits():
|
||||
return FLAG_FOR_REVIEW("Position limit exceeded")
|
||||
|
||||
# 5. Price reasonability
|
||||
if abs(order.price - market_price) / market_price > 0.10:
|
||||
return FLAG_FOR_REVIEW("Price >10% from market")
|
||||
|
||||
# 6. Duplicate order check
|
||||
if recent_similar_order_exists(order):
|
||||
return FLAG_FOR_REVIEW("Possible duplicate")
|
||||
|
||||
# 7. Wash sale check (if sale)
|
||||
if order.is_sale and potential_wash_sale():
|
||||
return WARNING("Potential wash sale")
|
||||
|
||||
return APPROVED
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Manual Review Required:**
|
||||
- Large orders (>$100,000 or firm-defined threshold)
|
||||
- Concentrated positions (>20% of account)
|
||||
- Illiquid securities
|
||||
- Complex options strategies
|
||||
- Customer-requested limit prices far from market
|
||||
- Pattern day trading (4+ day trades in 5 days)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## POST-TRADE REVIEW
|
||||
|
||||
### Daily Trade Review Process
|
||||
|
||||
**TIMING:** All trades reviewed by registered principal within 24 hours (T+1)
|
||||
|
||||
**Review Methodology:**
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Automated Surveillance:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
SYSTEM GENERATES EXCEPTION REPORTS:
|
||||
├─ Unsuitable trades
|
||||
├─ Excessive trading
|
||||
├─ Concentrated positions
|
||||
├─ Pricing exceptions
|
||||
├─ Options violations
|
||||
├─ Margin violations
|
||||
└─ Pattern day trading
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Manual Review:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
PRINCIPAL REVIEWS:
|
||||
├─ All exception reports (100%)
|
||||
├─ All options trades (100%)
|
||||
├─ All margin trades (100%)
|
||||
├─ Random sample of other trades (minimum 10%)
|
||||
├─ All senior investor trades (65+) (100%)
|
||||
├─ All new account trades (first 30 days) (100%)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Documentation:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# TRADE REVIEW LOG
|
||||
Date: __________ Reviewer: __________
|
||||
|
||||
Total Trades Reviewed: _____
|
||||
Exceptions Identified: _____
|
||||
Exceptions Requiring Investigation: _____
|
||||
|
||||
EXCEPTIONS:
|
||||
Trade_ID | Account | Security | Issue | Action_Taken
|
||||
12345 | 67890 | XYZ | Concentration | Contacted customer, suitable
|
||||
23456 | 78901 | CALL | Level violation | Error corrected, rep counseled
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewer Signature: __________ Date: ________
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Trade Review Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
**For Each Exception:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
☐ Review customer account profile
|
||||
☐ Investment objectives
|
||||
☐ Risk tolerance
|
||||
☐ Financial situation
|
||||
☐ Investment experience
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Review trade details
|
||||
☐ Security type
|
||||
☐ Quantity
|
||||
☐ Price
|
||||
☐ Trade date/time
|
||||
☐ Solicited vs. unsolicited
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Review account history
|
||||
☐ Similar prior trades
|
||||
☐ Overall strategy
|
||||
☐ Account performance
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Contact registered representative
|
||||
☐ Rationale for recommendation
|
||||
☐ Customer circumstances
|
||||
☐ Suitability analysis
|
||||
☐ Customer understanding
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Contact customer (if needed)
|
||||
☐ Confirm trade authorized
|
||||
☐ Confirm understanding of risks
|
||||
☐ Confirm consistent with objectives
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Determine action
|
||||
☐ Approve as suitable
|
||||
☐ Require additional information
|
||||
☐ Reverse trade (if possible)
|
||||
☐ Restrict account
|
||||
☐ Counsel representative
|
||||
☐ Escalate to compliance
|
||||
|
||||
☐ Document decision with reasoning
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## SUITABILITY ANALYSIS
|
||||
|
||||
### Suitability Requirements (FINRA Rule 2111)
|
||||
|
||||
**Three Components:**
|
||||
|
||||
**1. REASONABLE-BASIS SUITABILITY:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Question: Is this security suitable for SOME investors?
|
||||
|
||||
Analysis:
|
||||
├─ Understand the product
|
||||
├─ Understand the risks
|
||||
├─ Understand the rewards
|
||||
├─ Understand the costs
|
||||
└─ Determine if ANY customer profile exists for whom product is suitable
|
||||
|
||||
Applies to: Every recommended security
|
||||
|
||||
Required: Before making ANY recommendations
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. CUSTOMER-SPECIFIC SUITABILITY:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Question: Is this security suitable for THIS customer?
|
||||
|
||||
Analysis:
|
||||
├─ Customer's investment profile
|
||||
│ ├─ Age
|
||||
│ ├─ Financial situation (income, net worth, liquidity)
|
||||
│ ├─ Tax status
|
||||
│ ├─ Investment objectives
|
||||
│ ├─ Risk tolerance
|
||||
│ ├─ Time horizon
|
||||
│ ├─ Liquidity needs
|
||||
│ ├─ Investment experience
|
||||
│ └─ Other relevant factors
|
||||
├─ Security characteristics
|
||||
├─ Match customer profile to security
|
||||
└─ Document analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Applies to: Every recommendation to a specific customer
|
||||
|
||||
Required: Before making recommendation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. QUANTITATIVE SUITABILITY (Churning):**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Question: Is the OVERALL trading activity suitable for this customer?
|
||||
|
||||
Analysis:
|
||||
├─ Turnover ratio
|
||||
├─ Cost-to-equity ratio
|
||||
├─ Trading frequency
|
||||
├─ In-and-out trading
|
||||
├─ Control over account
|
||||
└─ Representative's intent
|
||||
|
||||
Applies to: Overall account activity
|
||||
|
||||
Required: Ongoing monitoring
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Suitability Scoring System
|
||||
|
||||
**Automated Suitability Score (0-100):**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def calculate_suitability_score(customer, security):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Calculates suitability score for a specific trade
|
||||
Returns score 0-100 (60+ = suitable)
|
||||
"""
|
||||
score = 100
|
||||
|
||||
# Age factor
|
||||
if customer.age >= 65:
|
||||
if security.risk_level == "HIGH":
|
||||
score -= 20
|
||||
elif security.risk_level == "MEDIUM":
|
||||
score -= 10
|
||||
|
||||
# Financial situation
|
||||
if security.minimum_investment > customer.liquid_net_worth * 0.10:
|
||||
score -= 15 # Position >10% of liquid net worth
|
||||
|
||||
# Risk tolerance match
|
||||
risk_match = {
|
||||
("CONSERVATIVE", "HIGH"): -30,
|
||||
("CONSERVATIVE", "MEDIUM"): -15,
|
||||
("MODERATE", "HIGH"): -10,
|
||||
("AGGRESSIVE", "LOW"): -5
|
||||
}
|
||||
score += risk_match.get((customer.risk_tolerance, security.risk_level), 0)
|
||||
|
||||
# Experience factor
|
||||
if security.complexity == "COMPLEX":
|
||||
if customer.years_experience < 2:
|
||||
score -= 25
|
||||
elif customer.years_experience < 5:
|
||||
score -= 10
|
||||
|
||||
# Objective match
|
||||
if security.objective not in customer.objectives:
|
||||
score -= 20
|
||||
|
||||
# Liquidity needs
|
||||
if customer.liquidity_needs == "HIGH" and security.liquidity == "LOW":
|
||||
score -= 20
|
||||
|
||||
# Time horizon
|
||||
if customer.time_horizon == "SHORT" and security.time_horizon == "LONG":
|
||||
score -= 15
|
||||
|
||||
return max(0, score) # Floor at 0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Score Interpretation:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
80-100: HIGHLY SUITABLE (green)
|
||||
60-79: SUITABLE (yellow)
|
||||
40-59: QUESTIONABLE (orange) - requires principal review
|
||||
0-39: UNSUITABLE (red) - requires principal approval & documentation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## CHURNING DETECTION
|
||||
|
||||
### Churning Indicators
|
||||
|
||||
**DEFINITION:** Excessive trading in customer account to generate commissions, inconsistent with customer's investment profile and objectives
|
||||
|
||||
**ELEMENTS:**
|
||||
1. Control (formal or de facto)
|
||||
2. Excessive trading
|
||||
3. Scienter (intent to defraud)
|
||||
|
||||
### Quantitative Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**TEST 1: Turnover Ratio**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
FORMULA: Cost of Purchases / Average Account Equity
|
||||
|
||||
Turnover = Total Purchases in Period / Average Account Value
|
||||
|
||||
THRESHOLDS:
|
||||
• <2.0: Generally acceptable
|
||||
• 2.0-6.0: Requires review, may be suitable depending on customer
|
||||
• 6.0-12.0: Presumptively excessive, requires strong justification
|
||||
• >12.0: Highly excessive, likely churning
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Customer Account Value: $100,000 (average)
|
||||
Total Purchases (1 year): $600,000
|
||||
Turnover Ratio: $600,000 / $100,000 = 6.0
|
||||
|
||||
Analysis: Borderline excessive. Review customer:
|
||||
• Objectives: If "aggressive growth," may be suitable
|
||||
• Risk tolerance: If "aggressive," may be suitable
|
||||
• Experience: If sophisticated trader, may be suitable
|
||||
• Authorization: If customer directing trades, may be suitable
|
||||
• Performance: If profitable, may indicate customer satisfaction
|
||||
|
||||
Decision: Requires documented review and justification
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**TEST 2: Cost-to-Equity Ratio**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
FORMULA: Total Costs / Average Account Equity × 100
|
||||
|
||||
Costs = Commissions + Markups/Markdowns + Fees
|
||||
|
||||
THRESHOLDS:
|
||||
• <10%: Generally acceptable
|
||||
• 10-20%: Requires review
|
||||
• 20-30%: Presumptively excessive
|
||||
• >30%: Highly excessive, likely churning
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Average Account Value: $100,000
|
||||
Annual Commissions: $25,000
|
||||
Annual Fees: $1,000
|
||||
Total Costs: $26,000
|
||||
|
||||
Cost-to-Equity: ($26,000 / $100,000) × 100 = 26%
|
||||
|
||||
Analysis: Presumptively excessive. Account must earn 26% just to break even. Unlikely to be suitable for any customer profile.
|
||||
|
||||
Red Flag: Likely churning. Immediate investigation required.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**TEST 3: Holding Period Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
AVERAGE HOLDING PERIOD: Total Days Held / Number of Positions
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
• 50 trades in year
|
||||
• Average holding period: 7 days
|
||||
|
||||
Analysis: Extremely short holding periods suggest churning, especially if:
|
||||
• Customer objective is "long-term growth"
|
||||
• Customer risk tolerance is "conservative" or "moderate"
|
||||
• Customer is elderly or inexperienced
|
||||
• Account is losing money
|
||||
|
||||
Red Flag: In-and-out trading pattern
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Churning Investigation Procedure
|
||||
|
||||
**STEP 1: Automated Detection (Daily)**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def detect_churning(account_id, period_days=365):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Daily churning surveillance
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# Calculate metrics
|
||||
turnover = calculate_turnover_ratio(account_id, period_days)
|
||||
cost_to_equity = calculate_cost_to_equity(account_id, period_days)
|
||||
avg_holding = calculate_avg_holding_period(account_id, period_days)
|
||||
|
||||
# Risk classification
|
||||
if turnover > 12 or cost_to_equity > 30:
|
||||
risk = "CRITICAL"
|
||||
action = "IMMEDIATE_REVIEW_REQUIRED"
|
||||
notify = ["CCO", "Branch Manager", "Supervising Principal"]
|
||||
|
||||
elif turnover > 6 or cost_to_equity > 20:
|
||||
risk = "HIGH"
|
||||
action = "INVESTIGATION_REQUIRED"
|
||||
notify = ["Branch Manager", "Supervising Principal"]
|
||||
|
||||
elif turnover > 2 or cost_to_equity > 10:
|
||||
risk = "MODERATE"
|
||||
action = "ENHANCED_REVIEW"
|
||||
notify = ["Supervising Principal"]
|
||||
|
||||
else:
|
||||
risk = "LOW"
|
||||
action = "ROUTINE_MONITORING"
|
||||
notify = []
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"risk_level": risk,
|
||||
"action": action,
|
||||
"notify": notify,
|
||||
"metrics": {
|
||||
"turnover": turnover,
|
||||
"cost_to_equity": cost_to_equity,
|
||||
"avg_holding_days": avg_holding
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**STEP 2: Investigation (Within 2 Business Days)**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# CHURNING INVESTIGATION
|
||||
|
||||
Account: __________ Representative: __________
|
||||
Investigation Date: __________ Investigator: __________
|
||||
|
||||
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS:
|
||||
Turnover Ratio: ____ (Threshold: <2.0 OK, 2-6 Review, 6-12 High, >12 Critical)
|
||||
Cost-to-Equity: ____% (Threshold: <10% OK, 10-20% Review, 20-30% High, >30% Critical)
|
||||
Avg Holding Period: ____ days
|
||||
|
||||
CUSTOMER PROFILE:
|
||||
Age: ____
|
||||
Objectives: ☐ Growth ☐ Aggressive Growth ☐ Income ☐ Preservation
|
||||
Risk Tolerance: ☐ Conservative ☐ Moderate ☐ Aggressive
|
||||
Experience: ____ years
|
||||
Net Worth: $__________
|
||||
|
||||
CONTROL ANALYSIS:
|
||||
Account Type: ☐ Non-Discretionary ☐ Discretionary
|
||||
Trading Initiation: ☐ Rep recommended ☐ Customer directed
|
||||
Representative Relationship: ☐ Trust ☐ Reliance ☐ Sophisticated customer
|
||||
|
||||
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS:
|
||||
☐ Trading consistent with objectives
|
||||
☐ Trading consistent with risk tolerance
|
||||
☐ Customer has ability to sustain costs
|
||||
☐ Customer understanding of strategy
|
||||
☐ Account performance: ____%
|
||||
|
||||
CUSTOMER CONTACT:
|
||||
Date Contacted: __________
|
||||
Customer Response: _______________________________
|
||||
Customer Satisfied: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Concerns expressed
|
||||
|
||||
FINDINGS:
|
||||
☐ No churning - activity suitable for customer profile
|
||||
☐ Borderline - enhanced monitoring required
|
||||
☐ Churning suspected - immediate action required
|
||||
|
||||
ACTION TAKEN:
|
||||
☐ No action - continue monitoring
|
||||
☐ Counsel representative
|
||||
☐ Restrict account
|
||||
☐ Transfer to another representative
|
||||
☐ Close account
|
||||
☐ Refund commissions
|
||||
☐ Report to regulatory authorities
|
||||
|
||||
Investigator: __________ Date: __________
|
||||
CCO Review: __________ Date: __________
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## OPTIONS SUPERVISION
|
||||
|
||||
### Daily Options Review
|
||||
|
||||
**100% OPTIONS TRADE REVIEW REQUIRED**
|
||||
|
||||
**Review Checklist:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
☐ Options approval current (account and level)
|
||||
☐ Options agreement signed
|
||||
☐ Strategy within approved level
|
||||
☐ Adequate buying power/margin
|
||||
☐ Position limits not exceeded
|
||||
☐ Suitability appropriate
|
||||
☐ Pricing reasonable
|
||||
☐ Concentrated position review
|
||||
☐ Naked positions adequately margined
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Options Suitability
|
||||
|
||||
**Special Suitability Factors:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
NAKED CALL WRITING:
|
||||
├─ Unlimited risk - requires highest suitability standards
|
||||
├─ Minimum requirements:
|
||||
│ ├─ Annual income: $100,000+
|
||||
│ ├─ Liquid net worth: $250,000+
|
||||
│ ├─ Options experience: 2+ years
|
||||
│ ├─ Demonstrated understanding
|
||||
│ └─ Risk tolerance: Aggressive
|
||||
├─ Position limits enforced
|
||||
└─ Daily monitoring required
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**🖤🛣️ BlackRoad OS, Inc.**
|
||||
**Trading Compliance & Supervision Playbook**
|
||||
**Version 1.0 | January 2026**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user